Skip to Content

Trump's 'Good Deal' for India: An In-Depth Analysis for Import-Export Professionals

21 January 2026 by
Himanshu Gupta
| No comments yet

Trump's 'Good Deal' for India: An In-Depth Analysis for Import-Export Professionals

By Sanskriti Global Exports by Himanshu Gupta

Trump Signals a 'Good Deal' with India: Navigating the Crossroads of Opportunity and Volatility

Introduction

In the world of international trade, few statements generate as much buzz and speculation as those from former US President Donald Trump. His recent remark that the US and India are "going to have a good deal" has sent ripples through the Indian import-export community. For professionals who have navigated the turbulent waters of his first term—marked by tariff escalations and the revocation of trade benefits—this comment is a double-edged sword. It signals a potential opening for a significant trade agreement but also heralds the return of a highly transactional and unpredictable negotiating style. As a trade analyst advising Indian businesses, my role is to cut through the noise, provide sober analysis, and outline the tangible implications of this development. This isn't just political rhetoric; it's a critical signal that demands strategic preparation from every player in the India-US trade corridor.

Factual Summary: The Context Behind the Quote

To understand the weight of Trump's statement, we must place it in its proper context. His first presidency fundamentally reshaped the US-India trade relationship. The core of his approach was a relentless focus on the bilateral trade deficit, which he viewed as America 'losing'. This perspective led to several key actions:

  • Tariff Impositions: The Trump administration imposed Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum from India, among other nations, citing national security concerns. This directly impacted a significant segment of Indian metal exports.
  • GSP Revocation: In a major blow to Indian exporters, the US terminated India's access to the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program in 2019. This program had allowed duty-free entry for nearly $6 billion worth of Indian goods, and its removal made products from sectors like engineering goods, leather, and jewelry less competitive.
  • Retaliatory Measures: India, in response, levied retaliatory tariffs on 28 American products, including almonds, apples, and walnuts, creating friction for importers.

Despite these tensions, a comprehensive trade deal—often referred to as a 'mini-deal'—was perpetually on the negotiating table but never materialized. Issues surrounding market access for US dairy and medical devices, India's data localization policies, and agricultural tariffs proved to be insurmountable hurdles.

Fast forward to the present, and the geopolitical landscape has shifted. The US-India strategic partnership has deepened, largely driven by a shared interest in balancing China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. Bilateral trade has, paradoxically, soared to record highs, exceeding $191 billion in 2022. This backdrop makes Trump's recent optimism particularly intriguing. It suggests a recognition of the strategic importance of India, but it is almost certain that his core 'America First' principles and focus on reciprocal trade will remain the driving force behind any future negotiations. The praise for Prime Minister Modi is characteristic of his preference for leader-to-leader deal-making, but the devil, as always, will be in the details.

Implications for Indian Import-Export Professionals

For businesses on the ground, this is a time for scenario planning, not celebration. Here are the key implications to consider and prepare for:

  • Renewed Tariff Volatility: A potential Trump 2.0 administration would almost certainly use tariffs as its primary negotiating lever. Exporters in sectors that were previously targeted (steel, aluminum) or are high-volume (automotive components, pharmaceuticals, textiles) should brace for renewed scrutiny. The mention of a 50% tariff in the source article, while likely a generalization, underscores the potential severity. Action Point: Businesses should immediately conduct a risk assessment of their product lines' sensitivity to potential US tariffs and explore market diversification strategies.
  • The GSP Restoration Carrot: The restoration of GSP benefits will likely be a key bargaining chip offered by the US. If a deal is struck, this would be a major boon for Indian exporters of leather goods, jewelry, auto parts, and certain agricultural products, instantly improving their price competitiveness. Action Point: Relevant export promotion councils and businesses should have their data and lobbying points ready to push for the inclusion and expansion of products under a restored GSP framework.
  • Intense Focus on Market Access for US Goods: A 'good deal' for Trump means greater access for American products in India. Importers and domestic producers in sectors like medical devices, dairy, poultry, and high-tech agricultural equipment should anticipate immense pressure on the Indian government to lower import duties and dismantle non-tariff barriers. Action Point: Importers may find new opportunities, while domestic industries facing US competition must prepare for a more challenging market environment.
  • Supply Chain Realignment as a Strategic Lever: The ongoing 'China Plus One' strategy could be a significant component of a new trade pact. The US may offer incentives for supply chains in critical sectors (e.g., electronics, APIs for pharmaceuticals) to shift from China to India. A trade deal could formalize this, creating massive opportunities for Indian manufacturers who can meet global quality and scale standards. Action Point: Manufacturers should evaluate their capacity to integrate into US-centric global value chains and highlight this potential to policymakers.
  • Pressure on Digital Trade and Services: India's push for data localization and the equalization levy on digital services were major points of friction with the first Trump administration. Any new negotiation will heavily feature these topics. A deal could force a compromise from India, impacting the operational framework for both Indian IT service exporters and companies relying on digital services. Action Point: The tech and services sector must stay closely engaged with negotiators to protect its interests.

Conclusion: Prepare for Proactive Engagement

Donald Trump's statement is a clear indicator that US-India trade will be a top-tier issue in a potential second term. While the phrase 'a good deal' sounds promising, it masks a complex reality of high-stakes, transactional negotiations. For the Indian import-export community, this is not a spectator sport. The path to this deal will be paved with uncertainty, potential disruptions, and significant opportunities. The prudent approach is to treat this as a period of strategic preparation. Businesses must analyze their vulnerabilities, identify their opportunities, diversify where possible, and engage actively with industry bodies and government agencies. Success in the next chapter of US-India trade will not be about reacting to headlines, but about proactively building resilience and agility into your business model today.

Source: Original

in News
Himanshu Gupta 21 January 2026
Share this post
Our blogs
Sign in to leave a comment
India Trade Alert (Jan 2026): New Digital Customs, UK FTA Progress, & EU Pharma Norms